From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:58:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207162685.23161.217.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080402182128.GA15403@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:21 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:07:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:47 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > echo "add file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > > > echo "remove file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > I think this would be better by module rather than filename.
> > KBUILD_MODNAME would be a better choice.
> agreed. i think 'KBUILD_MODNAME" provides a better interface. The original
> implementation was using complete source pathnames, so they were unique. Are
> 'KBUILD_MODNAME's unique?
Yes, not by file, but by groups of compilation units
that make up a module. I think that's more sensible anyway.
I also have patches to pr_<level> that allow for dynamic
prefixing of KBUILD_MODNAME, __FUNCTION__, and __LINE__
that might be a useful addition to a facility such as yours.
These patches also make the kernel smaller by removing the
direct uses of __FILE__/__FUNCTION__/__func__ from pr_<level>.
I intend to post them during the next merge window.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 19:49 [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure Jason Baron
2008-04-01 20:09 ` mws
2008-04-01 21:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-02 2:07 ` Joe Perches
2008-04-02 18:21 ` Jason Baron
2008-04-02 18:58 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2008-04-04 18:13 ` Jason Baron
2008-04-04 18:33 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207162685.23161.217.camel@localhost \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.