All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
To: "dean gaudet" <dean@arctic.org>
Cc: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert     i386
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:25:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207563950.7880.1246457209@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804061320470.7751@twinlark.arctic.org>


On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:22:58 -0700 (PDT), "dean gaudet" <dean@arctic.org>
said:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> 
> > The current generic implementation of ffz is O(lg(n)) already
> 
> it's O(lg(n)) time... the operations all depend on each other.
> 
> the implementation i pointed to is O(lg(n)) code space... and the time 
> depends on how parallel the machine is, they're not dependent on each 
> other.

Indeed. The worst dependencies are in the sum of all the partial
results in this implementation. And addition is associative, so
partial results can be written as ((a+b)+(c+d))+(e+f). Assuming
perfect parallel execution this would lead to O(ln(ln(n))). Good.

Care to implement ffs and __ffs like this?

Greetings,
    Alexander

> -dean
-- 
  Alexander van Heukelum
  heukelum@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-07 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-31 17:15 [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 17:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-31 19:38   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 21:58     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01  8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-01  9:46   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:41     ` [PATCH] x86: switch x86_64 to generic find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:42       ` [PATCH] x86: optimize find_first_bit for small bitmaps Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:47         ` [PATCH] x86: remove x86-specific implementations of find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-03  9:34           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-04  8:47           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-06 17:03     ` [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 dean gaudet
2008-04-06 18:51       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-06 20:22         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-07  8:43           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-07 10:25           ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-04-18 20:18             ` Alternative implementation of the generic __ffs Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 23:46               ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:09                 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  0:20                   ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:58                     ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  1:04                       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  1:11                         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  2:55                           ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  4:13                             ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19 10:05                               ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-04-19 12:10                               ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 18:17                                 ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19 20:26                                   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 22:29                             ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-20  3:06                               ` Joe Perches
2008-04-20  8:42                                 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-20 12:31                                   ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-21 11:43                                     ` Alexander van Heukelum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207563950.7880.1246457209@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dean@arctic.org \
    --cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.