From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zan Lynx Subject: Re: Reiser4: errors AFTER fsck Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:16:46 -0600 Message-ID: <1207585006.31700.2.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mP61C/80TyI2bQDm8OqH" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mat Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org --=-mP61C/80TyI2bQDm8OqH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 12:06 +0000, Mat wrote: > Volker, >=20 > storing the portage-tree on a "critical" partition such as /var isn't pro= bably a > good idea (yet),=20 > reiser4 gets more stable on an almost daily / weekly basis now but I stil= l have > the feeling that it's somewhat fragile in terms of use as a / (root / sys= tem) > partition; data-partitions seem to be completely rock-solid & safe, thoug= h :) I have been using Reiser4 as / on my laptop for a couple of years now and have not had any serious problems that caused data loss. I've had a few problems here and there but they have been solved fairly quickly. I've had to run full tree rebuilds overnight several times but never lost anything I've missed. :) I do run nightly backups to an external disk, that's probably why I never lost anything. Murphy is waiting for the external disk to fail before he screws me. :) --=20 Zan Lynx --=-mP61C/80TyI2bQDm8OqH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkf6SO4ACgkQolqWs/Y4NLw2cgCgl3hZArIRqyikYFQ0B2Qo4HaZ gsUAnAk6LQ1K+tzE1YLs2+rTYi3mPnN1 =L1IQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mP61C/80TyI2bQDm8OqH--