From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20080407205906.25bd06c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1207327534.4605.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1207327790.4605.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080407205906.25bd06c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:35:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1207740955.878.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Gerald Schaefer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Tony Luck , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Mundt List-ID: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Seem that git-s390 is currently carrying the old versions of these patches. > > I'll drop git-s390. Which will presumably kick off a cascade of droppages > due to git-s390 versus git-kvm damage control. All of which will need to > be undropped in some fashion when those trees come to their senses. Ho > hum. Yes, git-s390 wasn't updated for a few days. I've dropped all the hugetlbfs patches since the version we will push upstream depends on the cleanup which will go in over -mm. I keep the fingers crossed that the git-s390 now works again. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.