From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757377AbYERTvq@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757377AbYERTvq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 18 May 2008 15:51:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756169AbYERTvf
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 18 May 2008 15:51:35 -0400
Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:47699 "EHLO vena.lwn.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756097AbYERTve (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 18 May 2008 15:51:34 -0400
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tracking and crediting bug reporters 
From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 18 May 2008 01:53:25 +0300."
             <20080517225325.GD8140@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> 
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 13:51:33 -0600
Message-ID: <12083.1211140293@vena.lwn.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> How to indicate whether it's a Reported-by or a Bisected-by?

Bisected-by was meant as a silly joke; I think that would be taking
things a bit too far.

Thanks,

jon