From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51ABCDE69F for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:02:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Please pull 'for-2.6.26' branch of 4xx tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <20080416084349.3c9997f1@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20080415102704.39511160@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080416072758.092c83c5@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080416073139.7f56e72c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1208350247.6958.283.camel@pasglop> <20080416084349.3c9997f1@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:02:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1208354567.6958.289.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:43 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > For a final solution, we're going to have to come up with a more > clever > way of doing the clocking stuff in ibm_newemac. The SDRs are board > specific and completely outside of EMAC/MAL itself. So doing a > dcr_map Not board specific... chip specific. > on it becomes a bit more difficult, since there really isn't an SDR > node in the device tree at the moment. That is why I tried hard to avoid the bloody workarounds... unfortunatly, the HW is crap enough that we have no real choice here. Ben.