All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: path checker open() flags, devmapper ioctl()
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:21:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208467260.11770.105.camel@plop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208465743.11770.100.camel@plop>

Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 22:55 +0200, Christophe Varoqui a écrit :
> Notice to reader : real questions are hidden in this obfuscated
> message ! I'll mark them with ** to augment the chances for them being
> answered :)
> 
> Path checker maintainers,
> 
> ** would you object to my changing the checkers open() flags from O_RDWR
> to O_RDONLY ? ** Directio and readsector0 would not object, and all
> other checkers use the file descriptor to submit SG_IO ioctls which do
> not require Write capability.
> Re-reading the SG documentation at http://sg.torque.net/sg/sg_io.html, I
> understand it should be ok. In real life, scsi_id does exactly that for
> example.
> 
Please disregard this first part : O_RDONLY is already the flag use in
libmultipath/discovey.c

> The particular issue I'm facing is that on a RHEL5 box presented with
> EMC Symmetrix R2 Logical Units (write-protected LU receiving SRDF
> updates from R1 LU), the checker bails out on open(/dev/sd?, O_RDWR|
> O_NONBLOCK) returning EROFS. opening with O_RDONLY grants us a usable
> fd, which give the checker a chance to report the actual path state.
> 
> I'd like to fix the checker inconsistency, but we'll hit another wall
> short after that : because the device mapper refuses to honor the
> R2-multipath-tables loading without the read-only devmap option.
> 
> This behavior is new to RHEL5. R2 LU could perfectly be multipathed in
> RHEL4.
> ** Does someone have insight about this new kernel behaviour, and about
> the multipath layer desired behaviour in this context ? ** I personnaly
> would rather not care for promoting a devmap from RO to RW upon R1-R2
> split, and the even more tricky demoting from RW to RO (what about io
> flush ?) upon un-spliting.
> 
> Regards,
> cvaroqui

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-17 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-17 20:55 path checker open() flags, devmapper ioctl() Christophe Varoqui
2008-04-17 21:21 ` Christophe Varoqui [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-18 19:43 Christophe Varoqui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1208467260.11770.105.camel@plop \
    --to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.