From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2200: queue direct scans
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:56:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208832996.4232.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208829043.5327.13.camel@debian.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 09:50 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 13:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > When another scan is in progress, a direct scan gets dropped on the
> > floor. However, that direct scan is usually the scan that's really
> > needed by userspace, and gets stomped on by all the broadcast scans
> > the
> > ipw2200 driver issues internally. Make sure the direct scan happens
> > eventually, and as a bonus ensure that the passive scan worker is
> > cleaned up when appropriate.
> >
> > The change of request_passive_scan form a struct work to struct
> > delayed_work is only to make the set_wx_scan() code a bit simpler,
> > it's
> > still only used with a delay of 0 to match previous behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
>
> I agree with you the idea to split the current active request_scan into
> active direct scan and active broadcast scan. But can you merge your
> ipw_request_direct_scan_helper into ipw_request_scan_helper so that we
> don't duplicate the code?
Sure, can give that a shot.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-21 17:49 ipw2200: queue direct scans Dan Williams
2008-04-22 1:50 ` [Ipw2100-devel] " Zhu Yi
2008-04-22 2:56 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2008-06-02 17:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Williams
2008-06-03 2:11 ` Zhu Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1208832996.4232.10.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.