From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758822AbYDVH0E (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:26:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755284AbYDVHZw (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:25:52 -0400 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:11525 "EHLO viefep14-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753299AbYDVHZv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:25:51 -0400 Subject: Re: sched tree bisectability From: Peter Zijlstra To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu In-Reply-To: <20080421.203212.262634448.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080421.203212.262634448.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:25:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1208849148.7115.212.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 20:32 -0700, David Miller wrote: > While trying to bisect a regression added by the sched tree merges > today, I found the following gem that broke compilation mid-bisect: Hmm, sorry about that - I try avoid these things :-/