All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Nancy <nancydreaming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ubi-utils
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:37:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208936266.11721.25.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bae050c10804230027h6121713fw2f594d49d89e5137@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 15:27 +0800, Nancy wrote:
> OK, pass, will you please answer me one question:
> Compare with attaching only 1 MTD device, attaching 2 MTD devices will
> eat system resources a lot? will slow down the Nand write or read
> speed?
> All I need to know is the performances differences. Thanks a lot !

As I understand you are talking about splitting your single chip on 2
partitions and you are questioning about the difference between 1 big
partition and 2 smaller.

Well, I never tried this with real flash. But theoretically there should
be no difference. But I do not recommend you doing this with your MLC
NAND where an eraseblock survives just 10000 erase-cycles.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-23  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-21  8:48 ubi-utils Nancy
2008-04-21  9:15 ` ubi-utils Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-21  9:43   ` ubi-utils Nancy
2008-04-21 11:08     ` ubi-utils Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-21 11:49       ` ubi-utils Nancy
2008-04-22 16:30         ` ubi-utils Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-23  7:27           ` ubi-utils Nancy
2008-04-23  7:37             ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2008-04-23  7:53               ` ubi-utils Nancy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1208936266.11721.25.camel@sauron \
    --to=dedekind@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nancydreaming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.