From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E667DDEDD for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:19:04 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC][WIP][PATCH] Add IRQSTACKS to ppc32 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:18:57 +1000 Message-Id: <1209021537.9060.156.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 00:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > + /* > + * interrupt stacks must be under 256MB, we cannot afford to > take > + * SLB misses on them. > + */ > + for_each_possible_cpu(i) { > + softirq_ctx[i] = (struct thread_info *) > + __va(lmb_alloc_base(THREAD_SIZE, > + THREAD_SIZE, 0x10000000)); > + hardirq_ctx[i] = (struct thread_info *) > + __va(lmb_alloc_base(THREAD_SIZE, > + THREAD_SIZE, 0x10000000)); > + } > + The comment is a bit bogus :-) (about SLB misses). lowmem is your limit I think. Also, why not share the code with ppc64 ? Ben.