From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ INFO: iconsistent lock state ]
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:59:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209135549.32291.5.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd18b0c30804250747u4168bafsccc6feec0ba78c26@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:47 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 00:24 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
> >
> > > [ 13.269763] =================================
> > > [ 13.270954] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> > > [ 13.271865] 2.6.25-04569-gb69d398 #3
> >
> > What tree is that? git checkout gb69d398 doesn't want to happen here.
Argh, s/g// so the hash is: b69d398
Could we make that -git-# ?
> > > [ 13.272614] ---------------------------------
> > > [ 13.273521] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> > > [ 13.274745] swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> > > [ 13.275787] (&rq->rq_lock_key){++..}, at: [<c01208e9>] sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event+0x43/0x74
> > > [ 13.276859] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> > > [ 13.276859] [<c01423d8>] __lock_acquire+0x419/0xb70
> > > [ 13.276859] [<c0142bae>] lock_acquire+0x7f/0xa6
> > > [ 13.280188] [<c0394132>] _spin_lock+0x1c/0x49
> > > [ 13.280188] [<c0121c44>] scheduler_tick+0x43/0x1bd
> > > [ 13.280188] [<c012d99f>] update_process_times+0x3d/0x49
> > > [ 13.283524] [<c013daf6>] tick_periodic+0x66/0x72
> > > [ 13.283524] [<c013db1b>] tick_handle_periodic+0x19/0x6a
> > > [ 13.283524] [<c0105a87>] timer_interrupt+0x47/0x4e
> > > [ 13.286855] [<c015cf64>] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x4f
> > > [ 13.286855] [<c015e3e9>] handle_level_irq+0x7f/0xca
> > > [ 13.286855] [<c0105a27>] do_IRQ+0x71/0x8a
> > > [ 13.290190] [<c01043fe>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
> > > [ 13.290190] [<c038bd6f>] calibrate_delay+0x8f/0x276
> > > [ 13.290190] [<c04f0883>] start_kernel+0x27c/0x2f8
> > > [ 13.293520] [<c04f0008>] __init_begin+0x8/0xa
> > > [ 13.293520] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > > [ 13.293520] irq event stamp: 253965
> > > [ 13.296856] hardirqs last enabled at (253965): [<c0108069>] native_sched_clock+0xe7/0xff
> > > [ 13.296856] hardirqs last disabled at (253964): [<c0107fef>] native_sched_clock+0x6d/0xff
> > > [ 13.300190] softirqs last enabled at (253958): [<c0129cea>] __do_softirq+0xf9/0xff
> > > [ 13.300190] softirqs last disabled at (253953): [<c0129d3d>] do_softirq+0x4d/0x79
> > > [ 13.303522]
> > > [ 13.303522] other info that might help us debug this:
> > > [ 13.303522] no locks held by swapper/0.
> > > [ 13.303522]
> > > [ 13.303522] stack backtrace:
> > > [ 13.306852] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-04569-gb69d398 #3
> > > [ 13.336851] [<c01409f9>] print_usage_bug+0x106/0x113
> > > [ 13.340185] [<c0141823>] mark_lock+0x1ed/0x3a5
> > > [ 13.343519] [<c014244d>] __lock_acquire+0x48e/0xb70
> > > [ 13.346852] [<c0142bae>] lock_acquire+0x7f/0xa6
> > > [ 13.350185] [<c01208e9>] ? sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event+0x43/0x74
> > > [ 13.353519] [<c0394132>] _spin_lock+0x1c/0x49
> > > [ 13.360185] [<c01208e9>] ? sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event+0x43/0x74
> > > [ 13.363518] [<c01208e9>] sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event+0x43/0x74
Got it:
acpi_idle_do_entry()
acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter()
mwait_idle_with_hints() (32 bit)
local_irq_enable()
sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event()
I think my recent idle patches should address this, no?
> > > [ 13.366851] [<f883919b>] acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2b3/0x333 [processor]
> > > [ 13.370184] [<c02e5ec1>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x63/0x92
> > > [ 13.373517] [<c02e5e5e>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x92
> > > [ 13.380184] [<c010257d>] cpu_idle+0xb6/0xd6
> > > [ 13.383517] [<c0387071>] rest_init+0x49/0x4b
> > > [ 13.386850] =======================
> >
> > looking at current -linus I'm not directly seeing how we can get there
> > with interrupts enabled.
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 0:24 [ INFO: iconsistent lock state ] Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 14:47 ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-04-25 15:39 ` [PATCH] idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 18:08 ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 19:18 ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 22:05 ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 15:45 ` [ INFO: iconsistent lock state ] Justin Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209135549.32291.5.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.