From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Use of new scsi_allocate_command Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 10:22:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1209655360.3067.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4819C9DB.60104@panasas.com> <1209651854.3067.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4819DA39.70505@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:44849 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754694AbYEAPWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 11:22:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4819DA39.70505@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Matthew Dharm , USB list , Alan Stern , linux-scsi , Andi Kleen On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 17:56 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > The call to pci_map_page() on an ISA case will it not bounce the > buffer? Only if the system isn't a PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS one. That means basically either has an iommu/gart or has some silly swiotlb to emulate one. That means for standard x86 isa systems the answer is no: the buffer has to be allocated within the isa region because pci_map is simply a virt_to_phys. James