From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Walker Subject: Re: Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25 Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:19:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1210004376.17132.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <3efb10970805021102n4d87f55eue723786281b06fcb@mail.gmail.com> <1209753250.25628.34.camel@dd.thebigcorporation.com> <1209754467.25628.42.camel@dd.thebigcorporation.com> <1210003265.17132.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Remy Bohmer , LKML , RT , Thomas Gleixner , Jon Masters , Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:34984 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893AbYEEQTi (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 12:19:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:11 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2008, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > Download my tree .. It boots in my testing, and it's on 2.6.25 .. If it > > doesn't boot for you, just bisect down to the offending patch.. While I > > forward ported 2.6.24.4-rt4 to 2.6.25 I bisected several times finding > > errors (which reduced debugging time considerably.). > > > > Daniel, > > Thanks, but the bugs were caused by some of my backporting of other > updates (percpu and ftrace). I have them fixed, but I'm also looking at > rearranging the patch queue as well to get things ready for mainline. You should review my tree, it is several steps closer to mainline that the -rt version your working on. I did a lot of patch break-ups (required for bisection, and makes for a cleaner tree) and re-arranging patches. Bisection is also required for mainline integration .. Daniel