From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>,
Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:31:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210005073.17132.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0805051220590.25250@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > You really want bisection first. The reason is that you don't want ever
> > growing patches, you want smaller and smaller patches. For instance the
> > rt-mutex-core.patch is way too large, you wouldn't want to fold my
> > PICK_FUNCTION changes into that patch since that would just make
> > rt-mutex-core larger ..
> >
>
> Yeah, I already did that ;-)
You already folded my PICK_FUNCTION changes? That's why I mentioned it.
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 18:02 Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25 Remy Bohmer
2008-05-02 18:34 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 18:54 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 19:14 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-03 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 14:21 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:19 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 17:04 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 18:58 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-05 22:12 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 0:11 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 1:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 1:43 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 0:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 1:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 2:10 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 10:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 17:06 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 20:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:17 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:31 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210005073.17132.16.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.