From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:18:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210830415.21592275802431.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47dcc56312229fc8f25f39c2beeb3a8ba811f3e9.camel@gmail.com>
Hi, Bean
>
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 16:23 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> > +void ufsf_scan_features(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&hba->ufsf.sdev_wait);
> > + atomic_set(&hba->ufsf.slave_conf_cnt, 0);
> > +
> > + if (hba->dev_info.wspecversion >= HPB_SUPPORTED_VERSION &&
> > + (hba->dev_info.b_ufs_feature_sup & UFS_DEV_HPB_SUPPORT))
>
> How about removing this check "(hba->dev_info.wspecversion >=
> HPB_SUPPORTED_VERSION" since ufs with lower version than v3.1 can add
> HPB feature by FFU,
> if (hba->dev_info.b_ufs_feature_sup &UFS_FEATURE_SUPPORT_HPB_BIT) is
> enough.
OK, changing it seems no problem. But I want to know what other people think
about this version checking code.
Thanks,
Daejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200615062708epcms2p19a7fbc051bcd5e843c29dcd58fff4210@epcms2p1>
2020-06-15 6:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-06-15 7:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
2020-06-15 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-06-15 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Bean Huo
2020-06-16 1:17 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 11:44 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-18 1:03 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 6:12 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-19 0:16 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 10:22 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-19 0:12 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Avri Altman
2020-06-17 10:30 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 18:24 ` Bean Huo
2020-06-18 1:06 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 6:19 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 11:31 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-18 0:53 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-15 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Bean Huo
2020-06-16 1:18 ` Daejun Park [this message]
2020-06-17 6:55 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 8:57 ` Alim Akhtar
2020-06-17 9:41 ` Bean Huo
2020-06-17 9:53 ` Alim Akhtar
2020-06-17 7:08 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 10:09 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-22 4:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210830415.21592275802431.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1 \
--to=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.