From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756101AbYE0ORt@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756101AbYE0ORt (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 27 May 2008 10:17:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754673AbYE0ORm
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 27 May 2008 10:17:42 -0400
Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:55791 "EHLO
	viefep19-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754214AbYE0ORm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 May 2008 10:17:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       vatsa <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080527130828.GC20938@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
References: <20080527085830.GA20938@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
	 <1211888849.12349.28.camel@twins>
	 <20080527130828.GC20938@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:17:34 +0200
Message-Id: <1211897854.12349.47.camel@twins>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 16:08 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >...
> > FYI your attitude in the past few weeks is getting on my nerves - you
> > act all self important but have not made a single contribution to the
> > kernel above the level of a janitor-newbie.
> 
> Not a single contribution to the kernel above the level of a 
> janitor-newbie?
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676733
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/14/498
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/28/561
> ....
> 
> Awaiting your apology

Oooh, you caught a few bugs in review... *applause*. Of course I
understand you just forgot to append the url or git commit of the patch
series that added a significant feature to the core kernel, or solved a
significant issue.

I mean, counting all the way up to 3, that must have been taxing you.

So of course I appologise for my ignorance of your intellectual feats
and invaluable contributions to the linux kernel. </sarcasm>

Seriously, you're a good janitor, and I appreciate that. Stick to it, or
help write code.