From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K27TD-0001kw-VP for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:48 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K27TC-0001iy-2b for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K27T7-0001fO-Tk for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50558 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K27T7-0001fK-Qt for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:41 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:6393) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K27T7-0006KD-J6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:41 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 30 May 2008 12:28:39 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5CB619058; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080530105019.GB21035@thorin> References: <20080528213614.GA18932@thorin> <1212102772.4265.53.camel@dv> <20080530105019.GB21035@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:28:37 -0400 Message-Id: <1212164917.2436.0.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Cc: Jordi Mallach Subject: Re: [PATCH] arbitrary drive names in device.map X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 16:28:46 -0000 On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > By the way, biosdisk.c becomes a misnomer. If I understand correctly, > > biosdisk.c is not going to be emulating anything BIOS specific with your > > patch. > > How about renaming to util/disk.c ? Fine with me. Or we can go halfway and call it osdisk.c :-) -- Regards, Pavel Roskin