All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:04:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212390247.4368.107.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080602063519.GA26379@skywalker>

On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:05 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:38:35PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 09:39 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 08:50:32PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 08:44 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 02:10:02PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > > > > > ext4:  Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Need clear buffer_delay in ext4_da_writepage() after page has been writeout
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > We do that in mpage_put_bnr_to_bhs.
> > > > > 
> > > > Normally delayed buffer could be cleared in that case, but if allocation
> > > > failed in __mapge_da_writepages(), it will keep buffer_delay marked and
> > > > deferring to later ext4_da_writepage() to do block allocation. This
> > > > patch handles clear bh delay bit in this case.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Why not do it in ext4_da_get_block_write then.
> > 
> > The buffer head passed to ext4_da_get_block_write() calling from
> > mpage_da_map_blocks is a dummy one, to store the allocated extent, not
> > the bh that need map.
> 
> 
> ie true when ext4_da_get_block_write is called via writepages. In
> that case mpage_put_bnr_to_bhs clears the delay bit properly. How about
> the changes below.
> 
I see your patch below is trying to address how to detect and assign
blocks with your suggestion(i.e clear delayed bit in get_block). But I
don;t think it's needed. 

My last email I mean the buffer head new in mpage_da_map_blocks() is a
dummy bh, the real buffer head lbh is not passed to get_block. We could
clear the delayed bit on successful return of get_block,
mpage_put_bnr_to_bhs() ignore that dummy bh anyway. But that seems
twisted, unccessary.

I still think clear the bit in the ext4_da_write_page() is more clean
way. the original patch clears the delayed bit on success case. 

For the error case I think we could handle properly by only clear the
delayed bit if buffer is mapped.

Mingming
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 26f3626..9d25255 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -2873,6 +2873,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  		allocated = max_blocks;
>  	ext4_ext_show_leaf(inode, path);
>  	__set_bit(BH_Mapped, &bh_result->b_state);
> +	__clear_bit(BH_Delay, &bh_result->b_state);
>  	bh_result->b_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
>  	bh_result->b_blocknr = newblock;
>  out2:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 2194aa7..2a2f832 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ int ext4_get_blocks_handle(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  		goto cleanup;
> 
>  	set_buffer_new(bh_result);
> +	clear_buffer_delay(bh_result);
>  got_it:
>  	map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key));
>  	if (count > blocks_to_boundary)
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index c107728..0d05d7a 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -897,6 +897,14 @@ static void mpage_da_map_blocks(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
>  	int err = 0, remain = lbh->b_size;
>  	sector_t next = lbh->b_blocknr;
>  	struct buffer_head new;
> +	int delay_buf = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We clear the delay bit in get_block so remember
> +	 * whether we are doing a delay allocation
> +	 */
> +	if (buffer_delay(lbh))
> +		delay_buf = 1;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * We consider only non-mapped and non-allocated blocks
> @@ -926,7 +934,7 @@ static void mpage_da_map_blocks(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
>  		 * If blocks are delayed marked, we need to
>  		 * put actual blocknr and drop delayed bit
>  		 */
> -		if (buffer_delay(lbh))
> +		if (delay_buf)
>  			mpage_put_bnr_to_bhs(mpd, next, &new);
> 
>  		/* go for the remaining blocks */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-30 13:39 [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap write notification Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39   ` [PATCH] ext4: Inverse locking order of page_lock and transaction start Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39     ` [PATCH] vfs: Move mark_inode_dirty() from under page lock in generic_write_end() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39       ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39         ` [PATCH] ext4: inverse locking ordering of page_lock and transaction start in delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39           ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  9:35             ` Jan Kara
2008-06-02  9:59               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 10:27                 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 13:54                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 16:22                     ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 19:19                       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 12:41                         ` Jan Kara
2008-06-11 13:56                           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 17:48                             ` Jan Kara
2008-06-12 23:10                             ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  9:31         ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Jan Kara
2008-06-02  9:52           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 10:40             ` Jan Kara
2008-05-30 17:51 ` [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Mingming
2008-06-01 21:10 ` [PATCH] ext4: Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  3:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  3:50     ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  4:09       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  5:38         ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  6:35           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  7:04             ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2008-06-02  8:05               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-03  4:43                 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-03 10:07                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212390247.4368.107.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.