All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IW_SCAN_CAPA_ESSID vs hidden ESSID
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:45:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212428729.10093.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212354884.4722.26.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk>

On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 22:14 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Since upgrading from Linux 2.6.24 to .25, I have found that
> NetworkManager cannot associate my Intel wireless card, handled by the
> ipw2200 driver, with my AP, which has a hidden SSID.
> 
> NetworkManager thinks that wpa_supplicant should be able to scan for
> specific hidden SSIDs if the underlying driver advertises
> IW_SCAN_CAPA_ESSID, which ipw2200 does since 2.6.25:
> 
> 	/* Use "AP_SCAN 2" if:
> 	 * - The wireless network is non-broadcast and the driver doesn't support
> 	 *     scanning specific SSIDs
> 	 * - The wireless network is Ad-Hoc
> 	 * - The wireless driver does not support WPA (stupid drivers...)
> 	 */
> 	is_adhoc = (nm_ap_get_mode(ap) == IW_MODE_ADHOC);
> 	if (is_adhoc || !supports_wpa)
> 		ap_scan = "AP_SCAN 2";
> 	else if (!nm_ap_get_broadcast (ap))
> 		ap_scan = self->priv->has_scan_capa_ssid ? "AP_SCAN 1" : "AP_SCAN 2";
> 
> However, this doesn't work because the scan results just have an empty
> string or "<hidden>" (not consistently, which is weird).
> 
> So one of these components is doing the wrong thing.  Is it that:
> 
> 1. ipw2200 or ieee80211 should copy the selected ESSID into scan results
> 2. wpa_supplicant should not check the ESSID of scan results if it has
> already selected an ESSId
> 3. NetworkManager should not expect IW_SCAN_CAPA_ESSID to mean that this
> will work

You might also want:

http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2008-June/017873.html

that patch.  It fixes an issue that caused wpa_supplicant to never
probe-scan the AP in with a hidden SSID test configuration with ipw2200.

Dan



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-01 21:14 IW_SCAN_CAPA_ESSID vs hidden ESSID Ben Hutchings
2008-06-02 13:58 ` Dan Williams
2008-07-21  1:12   ` Ben Hutchings
2008-06-02 17:45 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2008-06-15 23:20   ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212428729.10093.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.