From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K5DfD-0003Pt-7L for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:59 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5DfA-0003NU-PF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5Df9-0003LP-4E for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59798 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5Df8-0003L3-MH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:54 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:8935) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5Df8-0008LL-H6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:54 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2008 01:41:53 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.46] (pool-71-185-129-251.phlapa.east.verizon.net [71.185.129.251]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB95B619058 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 01:41:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20080604233536.GA21711@thorin> <20080606155649.GA13255@thorin> <1212792832.1893.17.camel@dv> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:41:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1212903704.3071.48.camel@rd> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] biosdisk / open_device() messing up offsets X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:41:57 -0000 On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 16:37 +0800, Bean wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > It may be something else. It was an unclean reboot after a panic for > > unrelated reasons, so the hanging problem may be an issue with ext3. > > Anyway, extreme caution is required with the current code! > > btw, any chance your cpu is big endian ? The code might have portable > issue in big endian machine. The test machine is i386. The problems I'm seeing in qemu are observed on x86_64. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin