All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Hamill <gdh@acentral.co.uk>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Rebuild after a drive replacement
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:52:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212958349.7596.14.camel@gdh-home> (raw)

Hi :)

I've had a drive die recently, and took the opportunity to upgrade my
aging Debian sarge box to etch. Once the new OS was running and I had
finished beating booting from /dev/md0 with a blunt instrument, I turned
my attention to the data raid-sets... there's only one I can't sort out,
and of course.. it's the biggest one :)

eddie:~# cat /proc/mdstat 
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md3 : active raid5 hda4[1] hdg4[2]
      349702144 blocks level 5, 1024k chunk, algorithm 0 [3/2] [_UU]

eddie:~# mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hde5
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/hde5 as 3: Invalid argument

hda and hdg are 200G drives. hde is the new one at 250G. I have
configured the partition sizes + types (0xFD) identically, but the
partition number is different on hde because I wanted to put extra stuff
in the 'spare' 50G.. so the set should be using hda4, hdg4, hde5.

eddie:~# mdadm -E /dev/hda4
/dev/hda4:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 788aae08:cdb33dda:d82c141f:f33b4b89
  Creation Time : Sat Apr  9 23:46:23 2005
     Raid Level : raid5
    Device Size : 174851072 (166.75 GiB 179.05 GB)
     Array Size : 349702144 (333.50 GiB 358.09 GB)
   Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 3

    Update Time : Sun Jun  8 21:38:02 2008
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
       Checksum : 50a43565 - correct
         Events : 0.5864408

         Layout : left-asymmetric
     Chunk Size : 1024K

      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     1       3        4        1      active sync   /dev/hda4

   0     0       0        0        0      removed
   1     1       3        4        1      active sync   /dev/hda4
   2     2      34        4        2      active sync   /dev/hdg4


eddie:~# mdadm -E /dev/hde5
/dev/hde5:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 788aae08:cdb33dda:d82c141f:f33b4b89
  Creation Time : Sat Apr  9 23:46:23 2005
     Raid Level : raid5
    Device Size : 174851072 (166.75 GiB 179.05 GB)
     Array Size : 349702144 (333.50 GiB 358.09 GB)
   Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 3

    Update Time : Sun Jun  8 19:05:11 2008
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
       Checksum : 50a3f09d - correct
         Events : 0.5860156

         Layout : left-asymmetric
     Chunk Size : 1024K

      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     3      33        5       -1      spare   /dev/hde5

   0     0       0        0        0      removed
   1     1       3        4        1      active sync   /dev/hda4
   2     2      34        4        2      active sync   /dev/hdg4



eddie:~# mdadm -E /dev/hdg4
/dev/hdg4:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 788aae08:cdb33dda:d82c141f:f33b4b89
  Creation Time : Sat Apr  9 23:46:23 2005
     Raid Level : raid5
    Device Size : 174851072 (166.75 GiB 179.05 GB)
     Array Size : 349702144 (333.50 GiB 358.09 GB)
   Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 3

    Update Time : Sun Jun  8 21:38:12 2008
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
       Checksum : 50a43598 - correct
         Events : 0.5864412

         Layout : left-asymmetric
     Chunk Size : 1024K

      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     2      34        4        2      active sync   /dev/hdg4

   0     0       0        0        0      removed
   1     1       3        4        1      active sync   /dev/hda4
   2     2      34        4        2      active sync   /dev/hdg4

As you can see, only hde thinks it's a spare, when I want it to replace
that 'removed' in all cases. What can I do?

Debian etch, so kernel 2.6.18 and mdadm 2.5.6.

Cheers,
Gavin.



             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-08 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-08 20:52 Gavin Hamill [this message]
2008-06-08 21:32 ` Rebuild after a drive replacement David Greaves
2008-06-08 22:25 ` NeilBrown
2008-06-09  8:12   ` Gavin Hamill
2008-06-09  9:04     ` NeilBrown
2008-06-09  9:15       ` Gavin Hamill
2008-06-09 18:56       ` [SOLVED] " Gavin Hamill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212958349.7596.14.camel@gdh-home \
    --to=gdh@acentral.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.