From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K7G4f-0004bZ-Ra for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:41 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7G4d-0004Zk-VY for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7G4c-0004YL-Cs for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45043 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7G4c-0004YA-88 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:38 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:12418) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K7G4b-0008IB-Te for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:38 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2008 16:40:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE86E619058 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <4852CE60.1060605@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> References: <1213372559.29669.14.camel@dv> <4852CE60.1060605@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:35 -0400 Message-Id: <1213389635.22425.11.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Some concern about the journal support X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:40:40 -0000 On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 15:45 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: > can you send a message when GRUB2 CVS is considered no longer broken for > use with ext3? (so I'll know when is a good time for me to install a > newer version -- since I'm not in a hurry -- or is it a better bet > stability-wise within the next month, to go with a revision from May > instead?) I'm afraid it's not going to work this way. I can imagine that some fixes will be applied, but it's also possible that they will be incomplete. That would require further fixes. I don't think anybody would want to be in the position to announce that ext3 is fixed and then announce the opposite, possibly within hours. The true stability is proven by testing and time. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin