From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K9A1N-0002gF-CO for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:09 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9A1M-0002fI-Ce for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9A1L-0002dj-E7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53640 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9A1L-0002cH-8k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:07 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:56991) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9A1J-0002Qy-HN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:05 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2008 22:37:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6F9619058 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <200806190414.03881.okuji@enbug.org> References: <20080616091535.GA17206@thorin> <20080618221502.GA24751@thorin> <1213833412.5258.5.camel@dv> <200806190414.03881.okuji@enbug.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:37:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1213843023.5258.54.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [RFC] split floppy support off biosdisk X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:37:08 -0000 On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 04:14 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > I took a look at lzma 4.32.6. All code in liblzmadec is licensed with LGPL 2.1 > or any later version. So where is the problem? Indeed, the "any later version" provision is there. It wasn't mentioned in the original discussion. Then we are fine. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin