From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1K9Pin-00032q-5m for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:23:01 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9Pil-00031E-T7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9Pij-0002zu-TI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56457 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9Pij-0002zr-MB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:57 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:7687) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9Pij-0002V1-Fn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:57 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2008 15:22:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E11619058 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080619122014.GA9906@thorin> References: <20080616091535.GA17206@thorin> <20080618221502.GA24751@thorin> <1213833412.5258.5.camel@dv> <200806190414.03881.okuji@enbug.org> <1213843023.5258.54.camel@dv> <20080619122014.GA9906@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1213903375.3240.18.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [RFC] split floppy support off biosdisk X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:23:00 -0000 On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:37:03PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 04:14 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > > > > I took a look at lzma 4.32.6. All code in liblzmadec is licensed with LGPL 2.1 > > > or any later version. So where is the problem? > > > > Indeed, the "any later version" provision is there. It wasn't mentioned > > in the original discussion. Then we are fine. > > Maybe I didn't check in the right place. Anyway, the matrix at: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility > > seems to indicate LGPL 2.1 and GPL 3 are compatible. You are right. From http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html: 3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2, instead of to this License. (If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General Public License has appeared, then you can specify that version instead if you wish.) -- Regards, Pavel Roskin