From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] nfs: initialize timeout variable in nfs4_proc_setclientid_confirm
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:50:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214333459.7156.39.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48612E25.8050405@panasas.com>
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 20:25 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> gcc (4.3.0) rightfully warns about this:
> /usr0/export/dev/bhalevy/git/linux-pnfs-bh-nfs41/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: I=
n function =E2=80=98nfs4_proc_setclientid_confirm=E2=80=99:
> /usr0/export/dev/bhalevy/git/linux-pnfs-bh-nfs41/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:29=
36: warning: =E2=80=98timeout=E2=80=99 may be used uninitialized in thi=
s function
>=20
> nfs4_delay that's passed a pointer to 'timeout' is looking at its val=
ue
> and sets it up to some value in the range: NFS4_POLL_RETRY_MIN..NFS4_=
POLL_RETRY_MAX
> if (*timeout <=3D 0)
> *timeout =3D NFS4_POLL_RETRY_MIN;
> if (*timeout > NFS4_POLL_RETRY_MAX)
> *timeout =3D NFS4_POLL_RETRY_MAX;
>=20
> Therefore it will end up set to some sane, though rather indeterminis=
tic, value.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
> ---
>=20
> Trond, this patch merely initializes timeout to 0 which will
> result in it set eventually to NFS4_POLL_RETRY_MIN.
> Is this appropriate?
ACK. Since the existing will always return sane values, and nobody has
complained yet, I'll queue this up for 2.6.27 rather than pushing it as
a hotfix.
Thanks!
Trond
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 17:25 [PATCH RFC] nfs: initialize timeout variable in nfs4_proc_setclientid_confirm Benny Halevy
2008-06-24 18:50 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214333459.7156.39.camel@localhost \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.