From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:38:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214818706.23677.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440806300215w31abbcb3h6a42395e11701713@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 02:15 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I mean memory area reserved with reserved_early() or e820_update_range()
> > before reserve_setup_data() is called.
>
> before parse_setup_data, reserve_early is called for
> 1. kernel text/data/bss + initial pgt
> 2. ramdisk
> 3. ebda
> e820_update_range is not called.
> at this time early_res have RAM reserved by kernel.
>
> then setup_memory_map is called, so e820 have some ranges...directly
> from e820 table
>
> next need to call parse_setup_data
> it will add some entries in e820
>
> then reserve_setup_data is called, it will use e820_update_range to
> reserve setup_data itself directly in e820
>
> ...
Yes. There is no real conflict now. I think a better rule is:
- Reserve memory area (directly from BIOS or boot-loader, not from
find_e820_area) needed as early as possible.
- Don't touch reserved area until all possible reservation is made, that
is, before conflict check is done.
> >
> > And because there is no conflict check in e820_update_range(), what to
> > deal with potential conflict between setup_data and other memory area
> > regardless which one is reserved earlier?
>
> find_e820_area will make sure it only find ram from e820 and it is not
> conflict with early_res
For find_e820_area, this is safe enough. But what about conflict between
setup_data and ebda or ramdisk?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 6:32 [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN Huang, Ying
2008-06-26 7:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-26 7:48 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-26 9:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 2:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 2:48 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-27 2:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 3:03 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-27 5:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 22:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 7:03 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-30 7:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 7:51 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-30 9:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 9:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 9:38 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2008-06-30 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 23:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-01 1:09 ` Huang, Ying
2008-07-01 1:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-01 8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 2:45 ` Huang, Ying
2008-07-01 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214818706.23677.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.