All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework #2 of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:32:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214947935.5658.11.camel@earth> (raw)


Finally, this new version compiles and boots (applied a minor compilation fix).
Functionality is not yet fully tested though.

It's on top of today's tip tree.

Any objections to this approach?


---
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones in a generic way

(1) handle in a generic way all cases when a newly woken-up task is
not migratable (not just a corner case when "rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed ==
1")

(2) if current is to be preempted, then make sure "p" will be picked
up by pick_next_task_rt().
i.e. move task's group at the head of its list as well.

currently, it's not a case for the group-scheduling case as described
here: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.0/0134.html


Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>

---
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 7c96147..7bc73e8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -599,11 +599,7 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
 	if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running))
 		return;
 
-	if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
-		list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
-	else
-		list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
-
+	list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
 	__set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
 
 	inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
@@ -689,31 +685,33 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
  * followed by enqueue.
  */
 static
-void requeue_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+void requeue_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int head)
 {
-	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
-
 	if (on_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
-		list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
-		list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list,
-			      array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se));
+		struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
+		struct list_head *queue = array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se);
+
+		if (head)
+			list_move(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
+		else
+			list_move_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
 	}
 }
 
-static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int head)
 {
 	struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
 	struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
 
 	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
 		rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
-		requeue_rt_entity(rt_rq, rt_se);
+		requeue_rt_entity(rt_rq, rt_se, head);
 	}
 }
 
 static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	requeue_task_rt(rq, rq->curr);
+	requeue_task_rt(rq, rq->curr, 0);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -753,6 +751,30 @@ static int select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sync)
 	 */
 	return task_cpu(p);
 }
+
+static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	cpumask_t mask;
+
+	if (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
+		return;
+
+	if (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1
+	    && cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, &mask))
+		return;
+	
+	if (!cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, &mask))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * There appears to be other cpus that can accept
+	 * current and none to run 'p', so lets reschedule
+	 * to try and push current away:
+	 */
+	requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 1);
+	resched_task(rq->curr);
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 /*
@@ -778,18 +800,8 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	 * to move current somewhere else, making room for our non-migratable
 	 * task.
 	 */
-	if((p->prio == rq->curr->prio)
-	   && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1
-	   && rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1) {
-		cpumask_t mask;
-
-		if (cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, &mask))
-			/*
-			 * There appears to be other cpus that can accept
-			 * current, so lets reschedule to try and push it away
-			 */
-			resched_task(rq->curr);
-	}
+	if (p->prio == rq->curr->prio && !need_resched())
+		check_preempt_equal_prio(rq, p);
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -1415,7 +1427,7 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
 	 * on the queue:
 	 */
 	if (p->rt.run_list.prev != p->rt.run_list.next) {
-		requeue_task_rt(rq, p);
+		requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
 		set_tsk_need_resched(p);
 	}
 }

---


--Dmitry



             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-01 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-01 21:32 Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-14 14:50 ` [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework #2 of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15  3:01   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 13:05   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-15 13:14     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-18 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-01 13:32 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-01 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-01 14:19   ` Dmitry Adamushko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1214947935.5658.11.camel@earth \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.