From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KDpyu-0003m2-0Q for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:56 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDpyr-0003lX-N1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDpyq-0003l8-CT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41900 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDpyq-0003l5-2m for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:52 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:2621) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDpyp-0000gD-OB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:51 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2008 20:13:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081EA618F22 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:13:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080701171953.GA9105@thorin> References: <20080619133147.GA5018@thorin> <485AA89A.5030404@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> <20080621141907.GC24465@thorin> <1214058907.10018.39.camel@localhost> <20080626140836.GB7511@thorin> <1214493651.24653.10.camel@localhost> <20080629112241.GA2347@thorin> <1214846014.17554.6.camel@dv> <20080701155906.GC6985@thorin> <1214928117.13432.3.camel@dv> <20080701171953.GA9105@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:13:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1214957630.7362.2.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] add a counter in grub_dprintf X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:13:54 -0000 On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 19:19 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 17:59 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > > > Adding a complicated mechanism for having debug and non-debug images > > > > looks like an overkill to me. It could create more problems than it > > > > would fix. > > > > > > But then, what do you suggest? That we remove debug support altogether? > > > > Keep what we have unless we are under pressure to remove it. > > We _are_ under pressure. Some setups are too big for core.img to fit in > post-MBR region already. Then parts of the debugging code that goes into core.img should be good candidates for removal. However, we could probably start with lzma conversion (or did we pick gzip?) -- Regards, Pavel Roskin