From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fixup lwsync at runtime
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:34:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214991248.7436.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBD7C7F7-1EBB-4D73-88A0-72D079E800DB@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2001 bytes --]
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 09:48 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2008, at 1:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/
> >> setup_32.c
> >> index 9e83add..0109e7f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
> >> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ unsigned long __init early_init(unsigned long
> >> dt_ptr)
> >> PTRRELOC(&__start___ftr_fixup),
> >> PTRRELOC(&__stop___ftr_fixup));
> >>
> >> + do_lwsync_fixups(spec->cpu_features,
> >> + PTRRELOC(&__start___lwsync_fixup),
> >> + PTRRELOC(&__stop___lwsync_fixup));
> >> +
> >
> > This could be changed to use cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features, and then all
> > the call sites would be passing that, which would mean
> > do_lwsync_fixups() could just check cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features
> > directly.
>
> cur_cpu_spec and spec at this point arent the same thing.
Aren't they? I must be missing something:
struct cpu_spec * __init identify_cpu(unsigned long offset, unsigned int pvr)
{
struct cpu_spec *s = cpu_specs;
struct cpu_spec *t = &the_cpu_spec;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_specs); i++,s++)
if ((pvr & s->pvr_mask) == s->pvr_value) {
...
*t = *s;
*PTRRELOC(&cur_cpu_spec) = &the_cpu_spec;
...
return s;
then:
unsigned long __init early_init(unsigned long dt_ptr)
{
...
spec = identify_cpu(offset, mfspr(SPRN_PVR));
do_feature_fixups(spec->cpu_features,
PTRRELOC(&__start___ftr_fixup),
PTRRELOC(&__stop___ftr_fixup));
}
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 5:32 [PATCH] powerpc: fixup lwsync at runtime Kumar Gala
2008-07-01 6:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-01 7:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-01 6:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-01 14:48 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-02 9:34 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2008-07-02 15:57 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-03 5:55 ` Michael Ellerman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-26 15:30 Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214991248.7436.5.camel@localhost \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.