From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@fastmq.com>,
Martin Lucina <mato@kotelna.sk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Higher than expected disk write(2) latency
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:29:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215696541.24425.214.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080710011417.95532d51.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 01:14 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:12:12 +0200 Martin Sustrik <sustrik@fastmq.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > >> we're getting some rather high figures for write(2) latency when testing
> > >> synchronous writing to disk. The test I'm running writes 2000 blocks of
> > >> contiguous data to a raw device, using O_DIRECT and various block sizes
> > >> down to a minimum of 512 bytes.
> > >>
> > >> The disk is a Seagate ST380817AS SATA connected to an Intel ICH7
> > >> using ata_piix. Write caching has been explicitly disabled on the
> > >> drive, and there is no other activity that should affect the test
> > >> results (all system filesystems are on a separate drive). The system is
> > >> running Debian etch, with a 2.6.24 kernel.
Is NCQ enabled on the drive? The basic way to fix this is to have
multiple requests in flight, which isn't going to happen on sata with
the cache off and with ncq off.
So, AIO + NCQ should be fast, as long as your application has multiple
requests in flight through aio (or multiple threads).
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-28 12:11 Higher than expected disk write(2) latency Martin Lucina
2008-06-28 13:11 ` Roger Heflin
2008-06-30 18:10 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-06-30 19:02 ` Roger Heflin
2008-06-30 22:20 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-01 0:11 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2008-07-02 16:48 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-02 18:15 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-07-02 18:20 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-04 3:16 ` David Dillow
2008-07-02 21:33 ` Roger Heflin
2008-06-28 14:47 ` David Newall
2008-06-29 11:34 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-10 5:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-10 8:12 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-10 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-10 13:29 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2008-07-10 13:41 ` Martin Lucina
2008-07-10 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-10 14:18 ` Chris Mason
2008-07-10 8:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-10 13:17 ` Martin Sustrik
2008-07-10 13:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-11 15:17 ` Martin Sustrik
[not found] <fa.OZMA74BZPX46rhnjz1am4hB786M@ifi.uio.no>
2008-06-30 6:41 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215696541.24425.214.camel@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mato@kotelna.sk \
--cc=sustrik@fastmq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.