From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1216032601.12595.22.camel@twins> References: <6599ad830807092346j1fdb2ef9l2ca2b52e2e68096a@mail.gmail.com> <1215821034.5456.357.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1215821034.5456.357.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Helsley Cc: Daisuke Miyakawa =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E5=AE=AE=E5=B7=9D_=E5=A4=A7=E8=BC=94=29?= , Linux Containers , Paul Menage , "balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org" , Pavel Emelianov List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:03 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 23:46 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > struct cgroup_attach_state { > > nit: How about naming it cgroup_attach_request or > cgroup_attach_request_state? I suggest this because it's not really > "state" that's kept beyond the prepare-then-(commit|abort) sequence. Other alternatives: cgroup_attach_context, cgroup_attach_txn