From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9go-0007M9-8R for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9gl-0007Kd-TG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9gk-0007JQ-EC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52194 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJ9gk-0007JL-5C for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:10 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:13047) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJ9gj-0002Qe-T9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:10 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2008 12:17:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1157A4F1869 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1216217832.13612.2.camel@localhost> References: <1216040584.9995.52.camel@dv> <200807160115.07363.okuji@enbug.org> <1216164117.9604.8.camel@dv> <200807160132.18470.okuji@enbug.org> <1216165935.9604.26.camel@dv> <20080716071126.170a1d58@gibibit.com> <1216217832.13612.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:17:07 -0400 Message-Id: <1216225027.26635.40.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Next release? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:17:13 -0000 On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:17 +0200, Javier Martín wrote: > Same for me: I have the BIOS set up to boot from the second hard drive, > which then becomes (hd0) for GRUB through the BIOS (kinda like what my > proposed drivemap module does), but my /boot partition was on the first > hard drive, which is now (hd1). Took me a bit to realise things, and I > finally had to move around the whole partitioning scheme on the second > hard drive to put /boot in there. I'm not sure I understand why you had to move /boot to the second drive. But I think if GRUB refused to do cross-drive installs by default, it would help you consider a single drive install right away. In any case, it's a good thing. Now you can remove the first drive, and GRUB would load all the way to the menu. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin