From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KJVzn-0004Vz-7U for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:19 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJVzm-0004UY-5H for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJVzk-0004Sp-KN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32780 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJVzk-0004Sf-GJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:16 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:6039) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJVzk-0005wV-21 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:16 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2008 12:06:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F994F1869 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <487392C9.40208@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> <20080712144131.GE25455@thorin> <1216306949.21767.20.camel@localhost> <1216308135.16120.5.camel@dv> <1216309517.21767.26.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:06:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1216310773.16120.19.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 EFI patch X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:06:18 -0000 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 23:50 +0800, Bean wrote: > > It does not reach that point, the "unsupported machine type" message is > > thrown by this earlier check (line 59) > > Hi, > > Oh, you're right, use this patch: It's there already. Now I'm trying to simplify checks and make output more comprehensible. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin