From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KJYgW-0001UV-OK for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:36 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJYgW-0001TR-28 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KJYgS-0001LM-Do for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43625 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJYgS-0001LB-66 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:32 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:23084) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJYgR-0007lQ-KO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:31 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2008 14:58:30 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C604F1869 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:58:29 -0400 Message-Id: <1216321109.2285.1.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Idea: elimination of the normal mode (revised version) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:58:36 -0000 On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:24 +0800, Bean wrote: > Any comment for this idea ? Maybe you could describe was it will give us and what the drawbacks may be? It's hard to comment on the implementation ideas without seeing the bigger picture. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin