From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:03:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487FBB56.4070709@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:36 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:18 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> OK, thought about it. There seem to be two possible solutions
> >>
> >> 1. Get systemtap always to offset from non-static functions. This
> >> will use the standard linker to ensure uniqueness (a module
> >> qualifier will still need to be added to the struct kprobe for
> >> lookup, since modules can duplicate unexported kernel symbols).
> >> 2. Add the filename as a discriminator for duplicate symbols in the
> >> kallsyms program (would still need module qualifier). This is
> >> appealing because the path name would be printed in the kernel
> >> trace to help with oops tracking
> >>
> >> This is where negotiations come in. To me 2. looks to be better because
> >> it will help us with oops tracking. On the other hand, it's usually
> >> pretty obvious from the stack trace context which files the duplicate
> >> symbols are actually in; what do other people think?
> >
> > Just by way of illustration, this is systemtap fixed up according to
> > suggestion number 1. You can see now using your test case that we get:
> >
> > # probes
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/block_dev.c:929") /* pc=<lookup_bdev+0x90> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/nfsctl.c:24") /* pc=<sys_nfsservctl+0x6a> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@ipc/mqueue.c:642") /* pc=<sys_mq_unlink+0x130> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
>
> Hi James,
>
> Thank you for updating the patch.
> Unfortunately, I found another scenario; if someone make a module which
> has EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_open), it's a non-static function. but there are
> other static version do_open in kallsyms.
> Here, I tested it and got below;
>
> $ stap --kelf -e 'probe module("test").function("do_open"){}' -p2
> # probes
> module("test").function("do_open@?") /* pc=<do_open+0x0> */ /* <- module("test").function("do_open") */
>
> And I think similar issue will occur even if it is embedded in vmlinux.
Actually, no. This is only a module problem ... it's triggered by the
fact that the module namespace is different from the kernel's global
namespace. To get around this, I think the actual module (or null for
kernel) has to become an extra parameter to struct kprobe.
> By the way, can this patch solve the issue of -ffunction-sections?
Actually not entirely, no, if we go for only global symbols. The
compiler is entitled to spit out a section even for a static function as
long as it has a real body. If the module loader insterts stubs then
even an offset from a nearby function could end up being wrong
> Anyway, I think we still need solution no.2.
I'll cook up a patch and run it by lkml to try to gauge the reaction.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 18:33 [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) James Bottomley
2008-07-16 22:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-16 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 0:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17 1:49 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 14:18 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17 22:03 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-07-21 14:20 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1216313914.5515.25.camel__21144.9282979176$1216314027$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-17 18:30 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 20:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:33 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 22:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-22 18:00 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-22 18:11 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <1216751477.7257.115.camel__19834.5970632092$1216751567$gmane$org@twins>
2008-07-22 18:48 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:04 ` systemtap & backward compatibility, was Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-23 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 20:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
[not found] ` <20080723082856.334f9c17__2909.60763018138$1216827051$gmane$org@infradead.org>
2008-07-23 16:41 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 16:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 17:34 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 18:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 22:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-18 9:11 ` [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:02 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 13:28 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-18 13:37 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
[not found] <1216146802.3312.95.camel__45052.4692344063$1216146917$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-15 19:41 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 19:52 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 20:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 22:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16 2:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-16 10:56 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16 14:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.