Re: [PATCH] make it match explicitly when use option '-a', '-A' and '-d' to specify "list,action"

["Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>]

Hello,
Yu Zhiguo píše v Pá 18. 07. 2008 v 19:52 +0800:
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >> I know "list" and "action" can be changed, this is convenient.
> > No, it is undocumented.  As an author of system-config-audit I'd much
> > prefer if audit rejected such options, replicating the exact code in
> > auditctl in order to handle all undocumented behavior the same way as
> > auditctl is rather impractical.
> 
> Indeed it is uncompatible with manpage, but it seems that Mr. Steve
> like this convenient method:
Oh.  OK.

> >> -	if (strstr(opt, "task"))
> >> +	if (!strncmp(opt, "task,", p - opt + 1) || !strcmp(p, ",task"))
> >>   		*flags = AUDIT_FILTER_TASK;
> > Each string should be recognized only in the documented position IMHO.
> > The patch also replaces case-sensitive matching by case-insensitive,
> > which is not described above.
> 
> Both strstr and strcmp are case-sensitive.
You're obviously right, I'm sorry.  I wasn't paying enough attention.
	Mirek