From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KL1YC-00035s-MA for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:00:04 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KL1YA-00035W-W7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:00:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KL1Y9-00034m-9M for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:00:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60331 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KL1Y9-00034g-1T for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:00:01 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:55836) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KL1Y8-0002r0-OK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:00:00 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2008 15:59:58 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C379D618F22 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:59:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1216661010.3033.14.camel@localhost> References: <4883A568.10709@t-online.de> <1KKshv-1kdy2C0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de> <1216638178.8334.153.camel@localhost> <1216655461.3460.28.camel@dv> <1216659036.3033.10.camel@localhost> <1216659806.3460.61.camel@dv> <1216661010.3033.14.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:59:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1216670396.11291.2.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kernel fixes for Cygwin X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:00:03 -0000 On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:23 +0200, Javier Martín wrote: > El lun, 21-07-2008 a las 13:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin escribió: > > I think it's important to have a consistent format for modules. > I thought that two hours ago, but now I find no advantage other than the > sharing of modules between similar computers. Sharing modules is unsafe. My concern is sharing the code. If we use different formats, there are more place for bugs to hide or to appear. There is more work to test changes that can affect module loading. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin