From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: lockdep badness
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:47:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216939659.11188.61.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080724193828.GF9594@localdomain>
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 14:38 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Nathan Lynch wrote:
> >
> > A couple of stack traces below, the first is from benh's tree, the
> > second is from 2.6.26. The lockdep self-tests all pass at boot.
>
> Sorry, should have pointed out the code that is warning more
> specifically.
>
>
> > RTAS daemon started
> > RTAS: event: 295, Type: Dump Notification Event, Severity: 2
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Badness at kernel/lockdep.c:2719
>
> check_flags():
>
> if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)) {
> printk("possible reason: unannotated
> irqs-off.\n");
> }
> } else {
> >>> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!current->hardirqs_enabled)) {
> printk("possible reason: unannotated
> irqs-on.\n");
> }
> }
Yes, it looks like at some point the IRQ state gets out of sync, and I
haven't found out where yet. Having a repro case would help, what is the
setup of your machine ? I seems to be related to having an RTAS event at
boot.
> > ipr: IBM Power RAID SCSI Device Driver version: 2.4.1 (April 24, 2007)
> > ipr 0000:00:01.0: Found IOA with IRQ: 289
> > ipr 0000:00:01.0: Starting IOA initialization sequence.
> > ipr 0000:00:01.0: Adapter firmware version: 02200023
> > ipr 0000:00:01.0: IOA initialized.
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Badness at kernel/lockdep.c:2037
>
> trace_hardirqs_on():
>
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> return;
> >>> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_context))
> return;
As I said before, I'm not 100% sure what that is, it smells like
something legal that Ingo made not so anymore but I need to double
check.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-24 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-24 19:23 lockdep badness Nathan Lynch
2008-07-24 19:38 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-07-24 22:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-07-24 22:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-24 23:00 ` Nathan Lynch
2008-07-24 23:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-25 12:59 ` Sebastien Dugue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216939659.11188.61.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=ntl@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.