From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KN0Jb-00028S-A8 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:11 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KN0JZ-00028N-32 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KN0JX-00028B-Bj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42386 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KN0JX-000288-5h for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:07 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:48370) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KN0JW-0001IM-NQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:06 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KN0JV-0003Bo-U7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:06 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2008 03:05:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.225] (pool-71-185-138-248.phlapa.east.verizon.net [71.185.138.248]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEDC618F22 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: References: <20080725205339.GH18149@thorin> <1217134545.15984.13.camel@ct> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:05:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1217142302.16601.40.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.23.4 (2.23.4-3.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Misc patches for grub2 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:05:09 -0000 On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 14:00 +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > Our main repository is in Subversion, so whoever applies the patch > > should use "svn move" to keep the contiguous file history. Unlike git, > > which trusts the contents in the first place, Subversion is more > > sensitive to whatever users are telling it. > > I use git-mv to move files, which is the equivalence of "svn move". > But when I use git-diff to generate the patch, it looks as if files > are truncated. I can use git-diff -M to create a patch that shows the > renames, but it's not usable by patch. That's why I'm asking "whoever applies the patch" to be careful. > > IMHO that even worse. Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the > > trademarked software could be justified. But using a trademarked name > > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big trouble. > > > > Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer, but some people are, and it's better not > > to attract their attention. > > In fact, it doesn't replace bootcamp, it calls the service provided by > bootcamp. But anyway, it's not a big deal, I can just keep the name > appleloader. Fine. > BTW, any comment about the other changes ? Why do we need "crc"? If there are chances that it will be used for security, we should be using SHA-1. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin