From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KOG7i-0003c5-Oc for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:06 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOG7g-0003bJ-Rv for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOG7e-0003aO-GR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52213 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOG7e-0003a5-74 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:02 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:28060) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOG7b-00027t-6k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:59 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2008 14:09:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469E7618F22 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <261342.26585.qm@web31608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <261342.26585.qm@web31608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1217441396.24825.1.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Windows X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:10:05 -0000 On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 11:00 -0700, Viswesh S wrote: > menuentry "Windows" { > chainloader (hd1,1)+1 > } > > Is all this is sufficient or is there anything else I should add. I think you are better off describing the problem, not asking others to guess what could be wrong without knowing what the problem is. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin