From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KPsHR-0004nU-IA for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:49 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPsHP-0004nP-Mg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPsHN-0004nD-8M for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42615 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPsHN-0004nA-0z for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:45 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:46754) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPsHM-0001pB-Hf for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:44 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2008 01:06:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54551618F22; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:06:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080803200434.GA14582@thorin> References: <20080801144818.GA17609@thorin> <873aloixfu.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20080801153934.GA20000@thorin> <20080803200434.GA14582@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:06:42 -0400 Message-Id: <1217826402.10989.33.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Cc: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Subject: Re: rename grub to grub-legacy ? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:06:48 -0000 On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 22:04 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > No objection then? I don't think we need to move stuff around for such minor reason. Even though Subversion supports renames, it's not entirely transparent. Also, we still didn't match some "grub-legacy" functionality, including "savedefault" and network support. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin