From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ0x7-0000eI-84 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:22:25 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ0x5-0000bs-Cf for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:22:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ0x4-0000aP-86 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:22:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40252 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ0x3-0000a5-S4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:22:22 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:40396) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQ0x3-0005MO-IA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:22:21 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPzY3-0005aj-Qa for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:52:28 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2008 08:51:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7119618F22 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:51:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080804091619.GA737@thorin> References: <1217809888.6283.27.camel@fz.local> <20080804091619.GA737@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:51:25 -0400 Message-Id: <1217854285.27237.6.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Subject: Re: Current SVN is broken on x86_64 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:22:23 -0000 On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:16 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Furthermore, I had a look and some of the x86_64 versions are just stubs that > include the i386 one. > > Why don't we handle this like Linux? They ship a single directory and use > #ifdefs where appropiate. That enforces consistency in the dir layout. I think we can do it. i386 and x86_64 could be joined into one "x86" architecture with common headers and sources. Perhaps the users should still use i386 and x86_64 in configure, but the code should be mostly common. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin