From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ4lv-00024R-DC for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:07 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ4lt-000245-6j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:05 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ4lr-00023q-QK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55700 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ4lr-00023n-Lj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:03 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:15807) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQ4lr-0007Nm-AX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:03 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2008 14:27:02 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A80618F22 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:27:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080804151123.GA19951@thorin> References: <1217809888.6283.27.camel@fz.local> <20080804091619.GA737@thorin> <1217854285.27237.6.camel@dv> <20080804151123.GA19951@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:27:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1217874420.5933.0.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: Current SVN is broken on x86_64 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:27:05 -0000 On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 17:11 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Ok, but I think the i386->x86 rename would be overkill. We're already using > i386/ headers on x86_64 (for example, when building util/ stuff in grub-pc). It > doesn't hurt if we continue doing that IMHO. Fine with me. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin