From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>, arjan <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:25:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217921101.3589.98.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520f0cf10808041352h78bd4319x1802f018aeffe6dc@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 22:52 +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> Even after applying some fixes posted by Chirag and Peter Z, I'm still
> getting some messages in my log like this
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context swapper(0) at
> kernel/rtmutex.c:743
> in_atomic():1 [00000001], irqs_disabled():1
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.26.1-rt1.jk #2
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff802305d3>] __might_sleep+0x12d/0x132
> [<ffffffff8046cdbe>] __rt_spin_lock+0x34/0x7d
> [<ffffffff8046ce15>] rt_spin_lock+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff802532e5>] pm_qos_requirement+0x1f/0x3c
> [<ffffffff803e1b7f>] menu_select+0x7b/0x9c
> [<ffffffff8020b1be>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x5a
> [<ffffffff8020b1be>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x5a
> [<ffffffff803e0b4b>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x68/0xd8
> [<ffffffff803e0ae3>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0xd8
> [<ffffffff8020b1be>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x5a
> [<ffffffff8020b333>] cpu_idle+0xb2/0x12d
> [<ffffffff80466af0>] start_secondary+0x186/0x18b
>
> ---------------------------
> | preempt count: 00000001 ]
> | 1-level deep critical section nesting:
> ----------------------------------------
> ... [<ffffffff8020b39c>] .... cpu_idle+0x11b/0x12d
> ......[<ffffffff80466af0>] .. ( <= start_secondary+0x186/0x18b)
>
> The following simple patch makes the messages disappear - however,
> there may be a better more fine grained solution, but the problem is
> also that all the functions are designed to use the same lock.
Hmm, I think you're right - its called from the idle routine so we can't
go about sleeping there.
The only trouble I have is with kernel/pm_qos_params.c:update_target()'s
use of this lock - that is decidedly not O(1).
Mark, would it be possible to split that lock in two, one lock
protecting pm_qos_array[], and one lock protecting the
requirements.list ?
[ NOTE: this is the -rt kernel we're talking about ]
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur at gmail dot com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26.1-jk-rt1/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26.1-jk-rt1.orig/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> +++ linux-2.6.26.1-jk-rt1/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_arra
> &network_throughput_pm_qos
> };
>
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock);
> +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock);
>
> static ssize_t pm_qos_power_write(struct file *filp, const char
> __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *f_pos);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 20:52 [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep John Kacur
2008-08-05 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-05 20:49 ` mark gross
2008-08-05 21:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 22:18 ` John Kacur
2008-08-11 13:25 ` John Kacur
2008-08-12 22:49 ` mark gross
2008-08-13 8:24 ` John Kacur
2008-08-14 15:52 ` mark gross
2008-08-14 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-14 22:51 ` John Kacur
2008-08-20 19:14 ` mark gross
2008-08-25 16:34 ` mark gross
2008-08-25 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-26 8:48 ` John Kacur
2008-08-26 16:18 ` mark gross
2008-08-26 17:45 ` John Kacur
2008-08-28 19:38 ` mark gross
2008-08-28 19:44 ` mark gross
2008-08-29 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-29 6:31 ` John Kacur
2008-08-29 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217921101.3589.98.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jkacur@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.