From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m77Kk0Td001601 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:46:00 -0400 Received: from mule.trantor.org.uk (mule.trantor.org.uk [213.146.154.198]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m77KjlbX011219 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:45:47 -0400 Received: from lion.trantor.org.uk (cpc1-leds8-0-0-cust743.leed.cable.ntl.com [82.30.178.232]) by mule.trantor.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096401F1D6 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:45:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.87.26] (unknown [192.168.87.26]) by lion.trantor.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008F7C0048 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:02:15 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] metadata too large for circular buffer - any way to increase PV metadatasize? From: John Leach In-Reply-To: <20080807195241.GU7257@agk.fab.redhat.com> References: <1218132476.4013.10.camel@dogen.thepride.> <20080807194151.GT7257@agk.fab.redhat.com> <20080807195241.GU7257@agk.fab.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:45:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1218141946.4013.29.camel@dogen.thepride.> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 20:52 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > And if you have problems making space in the metadata to add the PV to it, > a workaround is to temporarily use in-filesystem metadata: > > create a metadata dir in a local filesystem (NOT an LV), and place an up-to-date > backup copy of the metadata there (from vgcfgbackup) > > update lvm.conf to start using this metadata (metadata/dirs) > - use verbose display options to check it's doing this > > pvcreate as in my last message to remove the too-small metadata area > - you're now relying entirely on the in-filesystem metadata > > add the new PVs to the VG as before > > revert the lvm.conf change Will this work with clustered LVM? If so, I take it all nodes will have to be configured to use in-filesystem metadata? Thanks, John. -- http://johnleach.co.uk