From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/43] x86_64: Restore the proper NR_IRQS define so larger systems work.
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:35:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218353792-3355-2-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218353792-3355-1-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
As pointed out and tracked by Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>:
Dhaval Giani got:
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
CPU 24
...
his system (x3950) has 8 ioapic, irq > 256
This was caused by:
commit 9b7dc567d03d74a1fbae84e88949b6a60d922d82
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri May 2 20:10:09 2008 +0200
x86: unify interrupt vector defines
The interrupt vector defines are copied 4 times around with minimal
differences. Move them all into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
It appears that Thomas did not notice that x86_64 does something
completely different when he merge irq_vectors.h
We can solve this for 2.6.27 by simply reintroducing the old heuristic
for setting NR_IRQS on x86_64 to a usable value, which trivially removes
the regression.
Long term it would be nice to harmonize the handling of ioapic interrupts
of x86_32 and x86_64 so we don't have this kind of confusion.
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> tested an earlier version of
this patch by YH which confirms simply increasing NR_IRQS fixes the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h b/include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
index 646d59f..3f4b1b6 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
@@ -109,7 +109,15 @@
#define LAST_VM86_IRQ 15
#define invalid_vm86_irq(irq) ((irq) < 3 || (irq) > 15)
-#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+# if NR_CPUS < MAX_IO_APICS
+# define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * NR_CPUS))
+# else
+# define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * MAX_IO_APICS))
+# endif
+# define NR_IRQ_VECTORS NR_IRQS
+
+#elif !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
# if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) || defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS)
--
1.5.4.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-10 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-10 7:35 [PATCH 00/43] dyn_array/nr_irqs/sparse_irq support v7 Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 02/43] 8250: Remove NR_IRQ usage Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 03/43] x86: add after_bootmem for 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 04/43] x86: remove irq_vectors_limits Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 05/43] add dyn_array support Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 06/43] add per_cpu_dyn_array support Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 07/43] x86: alloc dyn_array all alltogether Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 08/43] x86: enable dyn_array support Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 09/43] introduce nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:35 ` [PATCH 10/43] x86: using nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 11/43] drivers/char to use nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 12/43] drivers/net " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 13/43] drivers intr remapping " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 14/43] drivers/pcmcia " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 15/43] drivers/rtc " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 16/43] drivers/scsi " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 17/43] drivers/serial " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 18/43] drivers proc " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 19/43] drivers xen events " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 20/43] make irq_timer_state to use dyn_array Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 21/43] make irq2_iommu " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 22/43] make irq_desc " Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 23/43] irq: make irqs in kernel stat use per_cpu_dyn_array Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 24/43] x86: use dyn_array in io_apic_xx.c Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 25/43] x86: get mp_irqs from madt Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 26/43] x86: remove nr_irq_vectors Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 27/43] x86_64: use irq_desc() together with dyn_array Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 28/43] x86: add irq_cfg in io_apic_64.c Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 29/43] x86: put irq_2_pin pointer into irq_cfg Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 30/43] x86: put timer_rand_state pointer into irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 31/43] x86: move kstat_irqs from kstat to irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 32/43] add irq_desc_without_new Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 33/43] replace loop with nr_irqs with for_each_irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 34/43] replace loop with nr_irqs for proc/stat Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 35/43] replace loop with nr_irqs with for_each_irq_icfg Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 36/43] remove >= nr_irqs checking with config_have_sparse_irq Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 37/43] x86_64: add irq_desc in function in paramater Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 38/43] x86: check with without_new in show_interrupts Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 39/43] x86_64: rename irq_desc/irq_desc_with_new Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 40/43] seperate irq_descX with irq_descX_free Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 41/43] x86_64: sperate irq_cfgx with irq_cfgx_free Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 42/43] x86_64: make /proc/interrupts works with dyn irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 7:36 ` [PATCH 43/43] x86: put irq_2_iommu pointer into irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-10 9:21 ` [PATCH 00/43] dyn_array/nr_irqs/sparse_irq support v7 Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218353792-3355-2-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.