From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KU0Fm-0002tw-LK for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:10 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU0Fk-0002tr-Qk for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU0Fi-0002tf-MI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40879 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KU0Fi-0002tc-Eo for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:06 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:50761) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KU0Fi-0006Gw-3R for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:26:06 -0400 Received: from [85.180.51.117] (e180051117.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.51.117]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML29c-1KU0Fg306z-0001Z1; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:26:04 +0200 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1218732044.8610.2.camel@fz.local> References: <1218732044.8610.2.camel@fz.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:26:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1218810370.4406.20.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18PxCGdDpTuc5/qQCkgo71nQuomHcxvtLw/5Vv Rzdde5yIOzGD3umjVD+m/eEQWZDIyql1SP3pVWcYoQ74ibF5G8 FZomh9mliyUU1O6xSzWo6DBQEd2K+jO X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#495049: grub-pc: does not boot because module "normal" is not loaded] X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:26:09 -0000 Am Donnerstag, den 14.08.2008, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Hello, > > anyone has an idea why grub itself fails to switch from rescue to normal > mode, but just `insmod normal; normal' does work? > > For me this doestn't make any sense at all. > > If you want to see the initial report: > http://bugs.debian.org/495049 Now finally he said that GRUB fails to rescue mode with "unknown device fd0" At least I didn't need to ask for this. Maybe Robert has an idea about this and he sees the Debian bugreport anyway. With cross installing and so this fd0 problem was already topic on here and I even had it myself. But I haven't an idea about this anymore. I thought that this shouldn't happen anymore? And he reported against newest lenny version where this changes were included by Robert and me.