From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasks and groups
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:27:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219012051.25992.31.camel@Palanthas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A0741F.60901@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:17 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Well, a new version of glibc could use those to implement the posix
> > interface. Because as I understand it, glibc can break ABI on certain
> > version bumps.
>
> In theory. But this hasn't happened so far and I don't expect it to
> happen any time soon. New interfaces are not a real problem for me, though.
>
Ok, we'll see.
I still think that SCHED_SPORADIC task (but specially group!) scheduling
could be useful, even with a non fully-POSIX interface.
This mail only to say that I'm actively working on it, i.e., I'm
rewriting it with the new sched_param2/sched_setscheduler2 interface and
fixing some very glaring bugs that was present in my first code. :-P
Unfortunately, I'll be off the PC till September 4th... If you are still
interested in, we will talk about it at that time, when I'll post the
new version of the RFC.
I also hope, by then, to be able to show you some test cases and
overhead estimation.
Thanks all of you for minding me, and sorry if I wasted some of your
time. :-)
Best Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>>
(Raistlin Majere, DragonLance Chronicles -Dragons of Spring Drawning-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli
GNU/Linux Registered User: #340657
Web: http://www.linux.it/~raistlin
Blog: http://blog.linux.it/raistlin
SIP Account: dario.faggioli@sipproxy.wengo.fr or
raistlin@ekiga.net
Jabber Account: dario.faggioli@jabber.org/WengoPhone
GnuPG Key ID: 4DC83AC4
GnuPG Key Fingerprint: 2A78 AD5D B9CF A082 0836 08AD 9385 DA04 4DC8 3AC4
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-17 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-11 13:49 [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasks and groups Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 14:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-08-11 14:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 16:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 16:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 17:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-08-17 22:27 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219012051.25992.31.camel@Palanthas \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.