From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [2/2 -tip] x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:22:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219184546.10426.41.camel@earth> (raw)
[ Note, I've only done some basic testing. Anyone with ucode firmware files is very welcome to give this code a try
and blame me for any relevant crashes. ]
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring
This is the 1st patch is series. Here the aim was to avoid any significant changes,
logically-wise.
So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make
microcode_{intel,amd}.c
more about arch-specific details and less about policies like
make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu
(no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no
more microcode_mutex here).
All in all, more line have been deleted than added.
4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
---
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c
index ad136ad..b2f84ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
* Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug.
*/
-/*#define DEBUG pr_debug */
+/* #define DEBUG pr_debug */
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops;
/* no concurrent ->write()s are allowed on /dev/cpu/microcode */
-DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_mutex);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex);
struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ucode_cpu_info);
@@ -234,22 +233,6 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(MICROCODE_MINOR);
struct platform_device *microcode_pdev;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(microcode_pdev);
-static void microcode_init_cpu(int cpu, int resume)
-{
- cpumask_t old;
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
-
- old = current->cpus_allowed;
-
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
- mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
- microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu);
- if (uci->valid && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING && !resume)
- microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu);
- mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
-}
-
static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev,
struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t sz)
@@ -266,14 +249,15 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device
*dev,
cpumask_t old = current->cpus_allowed;
get_online_cpus();
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
-
- mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
- if (uci->valid)
- err = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu);
- mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
+ if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
+ mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
+ if (uci->valid)
+ err = microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu);
+ mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
+ }
put_online_cpus();
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
}
if (err)
return err;
@@ -285,7 +269,7 @@ static ssize_t version_show(struct sys_device *dev,
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id;
- return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->rev);
+ return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.rev);
}
static ssize_t pf_show(struct sys_device *dev,
@@ -293,7 +277,7 @@ static ssize_t pf_show(struct sys_device *dev,
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id;
- return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->pf);
+ return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.pf);
}
static SYSDEV_ATTR(reload, 0200, NULL, reload_store);
@@ -312,7 +296,85 @@ static struct attribute_group mc_attr_group = {
.name = "microcode",
};
-static int __mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev, int resume)
+static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+
+ mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
+ microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
+ uci->valid = 0;
+ mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
+}
+
+static void collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
+{
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+
+ memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
+ if (!microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &uci->cpu_sig))
+ uci->valid = 1;
+}
+
+static void microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+ struct cpu_signature nsig;
+
+ pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d resumed\n", cpu);
+
+ if (!uci->mc.valid_mc)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Let's verify that the 'cached' ucode does belong
+ * to this cpu (a bit of paranoia):
+ */
+ if (microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cpu, &nsig)) {
+ microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (memcmp(&nsig, &uci->cpu_sig, sizeof(nsig))) {
+ microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
+ /* Should we look for a new ucode here? */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu);
+}
+
+void microcode_update_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+
+ /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
+ BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
+
+ mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
+ /*
+ * Check if the system resume is in progress (uci->valid != NULL),
+ * otherwise just request a firmware:
+ */
+ if (uci->valid) {
+ microcode_resume_cpu(cpu);
+ } else {
+ collect_cpu_info(cpu);
+ if (uci->valid && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
+ microcode_ops->cpu_request_microcode(cpu);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
+}
+
+static void microcode_init_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ cpumask_t old = current->cpus_allowed;
+
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
+ microcode_update_cpu(cpu);
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
+}
+
+static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
{
int err, cpu = sys_dev->id;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
@@ -327,16 +389,10 @@ static int __mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device
*sys_dev, int resume)
if (err)
return err;
- microcode_init_cpu(cpu, resume);
-
+ microcode_init_cpu(cpu);
return 0;
}
-static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
-{
- return __mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev, 0);
-}
-
static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
{
int cpu = sys_dev->id;
@@ -345,7 +401,7 @@ static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device
*sys_dev)
return 0;
pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d removed\n", cpu);
- microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
+ microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
return 0;
}
@@ -376,33 +432,26 @@ mc_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu);
switch (action) {
- case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
- /* The CPU refused to come up during a system resume */
- microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
- break;
case CPU_ONLINE:
- case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
- mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev);
- break;
case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
- /* System-wide resume is in progress, try to apply microcode */
- if (microcode_ops->apply_microcode_check_cpu(cpu)) {
- /* The application of microcode failed */
- microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
- __mc_sysdev_add(sys_dev, 1);
- break;
- }
+ microcode_init_cpu(cpu);
+ case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
+ pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d added\n", cpu);
if (sysfs_create_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group))
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: Failed to create the sysfs "
"group for CPU%d\n", cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
- mc_sysdev_remove(sys_dev);
- break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
/* Suspend is in progress, only remove the interface */
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
+ pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d removed\n", cpu);
+ break;
+ case CPU_DEAD:
+ case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
+ /* The CPU refused to come up during a system resume */
+ microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
break;
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index a6e76cc..4006e5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -59,38 +59,28 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
/* serialize access to the physical write */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
-/* no concurrent ->write()s are allowed on /dev/cpu/microcode */
-extern struct mutex (microcode_mutex);
-
struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;
-extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
-
-static void collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu)
+static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
- BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
- uci->rev = 0;
- uci->pf = 0;
- uci->mc.mc_amd = NULL;
- uci->valid = 1;
+ memset(csig, 0, sizeof(*csig));
if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86 < 0x10) {
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d not a capable AMD processor\n",
cpu);
- uci->valid = 0;
- return;
+ return -1;
}
asm volatile("movl %1, %%ecx; rdmsr"
- : "=a" (uci->rev)
+ : "=a" (csig->rev)
: "i" (0x0000008B) : "ecx");
printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: collect_cpu_info_amd : patch_id=0x%x\n",
- uci->rev);
+ csig->rev);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int get_matching_microcode_amd(void *mc, int cpu)
@@ -119,7 +109,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode_amd(void *mc, int
cpu)
if (equiv_cpu_table == NULL) {
printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d microcode update with "
"version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
- cpu, mc_header->patch_id, uci->rev);
+ cpu, mc_header->patch_id, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
goto out;
}
@@ -185,12 +175,12 @@ static int get_matching_microcode_amd(void *mc,
int cpu)
pci_dev_put(sb_pci_dev);
}
- if (mc_header->patch_id <= uci->rev)
+ if (mc_header->patch_id <= uci->cpu_sig.rev)
return 0;
printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode "
"update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
- cpu, mc_header->patch_id, uci->rev);
+ cpu, mc_header->patch_id, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
out:
new_mc = vmalloc(UCODE_MAX_SIZE);
@@ -250,9 +240,9 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision "
"0x%x to 0x%x \n",
- cpu_num, uci->rev, uci->mc.mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
+ cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, uci->mc.mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
- uci->rev = rev;
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE
@@ -437,61 +427,18 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode_amd(int cpu)
return error;
}
-static int apply_microcode_check_cpu_amd(int cpu)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- unsigned int rev;
- cpumask_t old;
- int err = 0;
-
- /* Check if the microcode is available */
- if (!uci->mc.mc_amd)
- return 0;
-
- old = current->cpus_allowed;
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
-
- /* Check if the microcode we have in memory matches the CPU */
- if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86 < 16)
- err = -EINVAL;
-
- if (!err) {
- asm volatile("movl %1, %%ecx; rdmsr"
- : "=a" (rev)
- : "i" (0x0000008B) : "ecx");
-
- if (uci->rev != rev)
- err = -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (!err)
- apply_microcode_amd(cpu);
- else
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: Could not apply microcode to CPU%d:"
- " rev=0x%x\n",
- cpu, uci->rev);
-
- set_cpus_allowed(current, old);
- return err;
-}
-
static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
- uci->valid = 0;
vfree(uci->mc.mc_amd);
uci->mc.mc_amd = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
}
static struct microcode_ops microcode_amd_ops = {
.get_next_ucode = get_next_ucode_amd,
.get_matching_microcode = get_matching_microcode_amd,
.microcode_sanity_check = NULL,
- .apply_microcode_check_cpu = apply_microcode_check_cpu_amd,
.cpu_request_microcode = cpu_request_microcode_amd,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info_amd,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_amd,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
index 6dd8907..c9b5320 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
@@ -122,46 +122,37 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
/* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(microcode_update_lock);
-/* no concurrent ->write()s are allowed on /dev/cpu/microcode */
-extern struct mutex microcode_mutex;
-
-extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
-
-static void collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num)
+static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;
unsigned int val[2];
- /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
- BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu_num);
- uci->pf = uci->rev = 0;
- uci->mc.mc_intel = NULL;
- uci->valid = 1;
+ memset(csig, 0, sizeof(*csig));
if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c->x86 < 6 ||
cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d not a capable Intel "
"processor\n", cpu_num);
- uci->valid = 0;
- return;
+ return -1;
}
- uci->sig = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
+ csig->sig = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
if ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6)) {
/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
- uci->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
+ csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
}
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* see notes above for revision 1.07. Apparent chip bug */
sync_core();
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], uci->rev);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
pr_debug("microcode: collect_cpu_info : sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x
\n",
- uci->sig, uci->pf, uci->rev);
+ csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
+
+ return 0;
}
static inline int microcode_update_match(int cpu_num,
@@ -169,8 +160,8 @@ static inline int microcode_update_match(int
cpu_num,
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;
- if (!sigmatch(sig, uci->sig, pf, uci->pf)
- || mc_header->rev <= uci->rev)
+ if (!sigmatch(sig, uci->cpu_sig.sig, pf, uci->cpu_sig.pf)
+ || mc_header->rev <= uci->cpu_sig.rev)
return 0;
return 1;
}
@@ -289,7 +280,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(void *mc, int cpu)
find:
pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
" version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
- cpu, mc_header->rev, uci->rev);
+ cpu, mc_header->rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
new_mc = vmalloc(total_size);
if (!new_mc) {
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: error! Can not allocate memory\n");
@@ -335,16 +326,16 @@ static void apply_microcode(int cpu)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(µcode_update_lock, flags);
if (val[1] != uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision "
- "0x%x to 0x%x failed\n", cpu_num, uci->rev, val[1]);
+ "0x%x to 0x%x failed\n", cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1]);
return;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision "
"0x%x to 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x \n",
- cpu_num, uci->rev, val[1],
+ cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1],
uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date & 0xffff,
uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date >> 24,
(uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
- uci->rev = val[1];
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE
@@ -459,70 +450,18 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu)
return error;
}
-static int apply_microcode_check_cpu(int cpu)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- cpumask_t old;
- unsigned int val[2];
- int err = 0;
-
- /* Check if the microcode is available */
- if (!uci->mc.mc_intel)
- return 0;
-
- old = current->cpus_allowed;
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
-
- /* Check if the microcode we have in memory matches the CPU */
- if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c->x86 < 6 ||
- cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64) || uci->sig != cpuid_eax(0x00000001))
- err = -EINVAL;
-
- if (!err && ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6))) {
- /* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
- if (uci->pf != (1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7)))
- err = -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (!err) {
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
- /* see notes above for revision 1.07. Apparent chip bug */
- sync_core();
- /* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
- if (uci->rev != val[1])
- err = -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (!err)
- apply_microcode(cpu);
- else
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: Could not apply microcode to CPU%d:"
- " sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x\n",
- cpu, uci->sig, uci->pf, uci->rev);
-
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &old);
- return err;
-}
-
static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
- uci->valid = 0;
vfree(uci->mc.mc_intel);
uci->mc.mc_intel = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
}
static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
.get_next_ucode = get_next_ucode,
.get_matching_microcode = get_matching_microcode,
.microcode_sanity_check = microcode_sanity_check,
- .apply_microcode_check_cpu = apply_microcode_check_cpu,
.cpu_request_microcode = cpu_request_microcode,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode,
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
index 18b2aee..7ceff48 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
@@ -1,14 +1,18 @@
+#ifndef ASM_X86__MICROCODE_H
+#define ASM_X86__MICROCODE_H
+
extern int microcode_init(void *opaque, struct module *module);
extern void microcode_exit(void);
+struct cpu_signature;
+
struct microcode_ops {
long (*get_next_ucode)(void **mc, long offset);
long (*microcode_get_next_ucode)(void **mc, long offset);
int (*get_matching_microcode)(void *mc, int cpu);
- int (*apply_microcode_check_cpu)(int cpu);
int (*microcode_sanity_check)(void *mc);
int (*cpu_request_microcode)(int cpu);
- void (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu_num);
+ int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig);
void (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
void (*microcode_fini_cpu)(int cpu);
void (*clear_patch)(void *data);
@@ -75,13 +79,21 @@ struct microcode_amd {
unsigned int mpb[0];
};
-struct ucode_cpu_info {
- int valid;
+struct cpu_signature {
unsigned int sig;
unsigned int pf;
unsigned int rev;
+};
+
+struct ucode_cpu_info {
+ struct cpu_signature cpu_sig;
+ int valid;
union {
struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
+ void *valid_mc;
} mc;
};
+extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[];
+
+#endif /* ASM_X86__MICROCODE_H */
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 22:22 Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-08-20 10:19 ` [2/2 -tip] x86-microcode: generic interface refactoring Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20 13:59 ` BUG: " Peter Oruba
2008-08-20 14:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-20 15:06 ` Peter Oruba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219184546.10426.41.camel@earth \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.